<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Tax Forum &#187; Kay Bell;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thetaxforum.org/tag/kay-bell/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thetaxforum.org</link>
	<description>Tax Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>WHAT’S THE BUZZ?  TELL ME WHAT’S A HAPPENNIN’</title>
		<link>http://thetaxforum.org/1466/what%e2%80%99s-the-buzz-tell-me-what%e2%80%99s-a-happennin%e2%80%99.htm</link>
		<comments>http://thetaxforum.org/1466/what%e2%80%99s-the-buzz-tell-me-what%e2%80%99s-a-happennin%e2%80%99.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>THE WANDERING TAX PRO</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Rangel;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College Co;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honolulu;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Ways & Means Committee;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hr Block]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal Revenue Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Rose;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Kristan;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kay Bell;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Rozbruch;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATP;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-tax personal finance blog;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online poll;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Caron;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Pappas;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rdf;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Institute;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax law;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Washington Post;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ways and Means Committee;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetaxforum.org/?p=1466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[* It is great when this kind of advice comes from a non-tax personal finance blog. In her post “Should You Trust Your Broker” at OUT OF DEBT CHRISTIAN (Restoring Your Finances and Your Faith) Kathryn advices, “Talk with your tax accountant before making any moves with your money. The broker may THINK he knows [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="justify"><span>* It is great when this kind of advice comes from a non-tax personal finance blog. In her post “<a href="http://www.outofdebtchristian.com/investing/should-you-trust-your-broker"><strong><span>Should You Trust Your Broker</span></strong></a>” at OUT OF DEBT CHRISTIAN (Restoring Your Finances and Your Faith) Kathryn advices, “<em>Talk with your tax accountant before making any moves with your money. The broker may THINK he knows tax law but things could have changed. It is best to talk with the tax expert before making decisions that affect your taxes</em>.” Remember &#8211; a stock broker is just a salesman who makes his/her living by selling. No sale &#8211; no income.</p>
<p>* Fellow twit, and fellow tax blogger, <a href="http://www.taxresolution.com/blog"><strong><span>Michael Rozbruch</span></strong></a> “turned me on” to an article from the Washington Post titled, “<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/09/AR2009010901379.html"><strong><span>Don’t Wait for Obama to Cut Your Taxes</span></strong></a>”. It provides some good advice and resources.</p>
<p>* The TAXGIRL does not take week-ends off (actually none of “us” do this time of the year). Last Saturday she provided a good answer to a common question in “<a href="http://www.taxgirl.com/ask-the-taxgirl-1099-for-closed-business"><strong><span>Ask the taxgirl: 1099 for Closed Business</span></strong></a>”.</p>
<p>* Kelly answers another oft asked question in “<a href="http://www.taxgirl.com/ask-the-taxgirl-running-as-fast-as-i-can"><strong><span>Ask the taxgirl: Running As Fast As I Can</span></strong></a>”. Her correct answer points up another inequity in the Tax Code – another instance where the taxpayer must bend over. Income is reported on Page 1, increasing AGI, but related deductions claimed on Schedule A (lost to non-itemizers) as “miscellaneous” subject to the 2% of AGI exclusion. To be fair only excess hobby income should be reported on Page 1.</span></div>
<div align="justify"><span>.</span></div>
<div align="justify"><span>And an aside about runners &#8211; I have never seen a runner with a smile on his/her face. They all look like they are in pain. Isn&#8217;t walking, or riding a bike, a much better and safer form of exercise?</span></div>
<div align="justify"><span>.</span></div>
<div align="justify"><span>* Joe Kristan of the <a href="http://www.rothcpa.com/archives/004355.php#004355"><strong><span>ROTH AND COMPANY TAX UPDATE BLOG</span></strong></a> reports that “<em>House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charles Rangel has held on for a convincing victory in our 2008 Taxpayer of the Year voting</em>”.</p>
<p>* From the “I couldn’t have said it better” file – Kay Bell said it all when she pointed out “<em>From the get-go, the lack of oversight in administering the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) has made every bailout handout a very unfunny, and egregiously costly, joke. And since Congress opened up the bailout door so wide, then who&#8217;s to stop any legal business form seeking relief?</em>” in her post “<a href="http://dontmesswithtaxes.typepad.com/dont_mess_with_taxes/2009/01/next-in-bailout-line-porn-.html"><strong><span>Next In Bailout Line: Porn</span></strong></a>” at DON’T MESS WITH TAXES.</p>
<p>* Kay has also provides a good basic overview of the many educational tax benefits that are available in her post “<a href="http://dontmesswithtaxes.typepad.com/dont_mess_with_taxes/2009/01/rags-riches-and-college-costs.html"><strong><span>Rags, Riches and College Co</span></strong></a><strong><span>sts</span></strong>”</p>
<p>* TAXPROF Paul Caron quotes from the Wall Street Journal to tell us “<a href="http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2009/01/obama-plans-to-keep.html"><strong><span>Obama Plans to Keep Estate Tax</span></strong></a>” -</p>
<p>“<em>President-elect Barack Obama and congressional leaders plan to move soon to block the estate tax from disappearing in 2010.</p>
<p>Under the Obama plan detailed during the campaign, the estate tax would be locked in permanently at the rate and exemption levels that took effect this year. That would exempt estates of $3.5 million &#8212; $7 million for couples &#8212; from any taxation</em>.”</p>
<p>*Jeff Rose provides a good answer to ”<a href="http://www.goodfinancialcents.com/tax-loss-on-529-plans/#more-1647"><strong><span>Reader Question #4- Can I Take a Tax Loss on My Kids 529 Plans?</span></strong></a>” over at GOOD FINANCIAL CENTS (Helping you make “cents” of your investments).</p>
<p>Jeff smartly ends his answer with, “<em>be sure to speak with your tax advisor just to make sure</em>”.</p>
<p>* An AccountantsWorld.com article reports “<a href="http://www.accountantsworld.com/desktopdefault.aspx?page=newsstory&amp;category=newsstory&amp;StoryId=i0112012.0nw"><strong><span>Americans Failing Taxes 101</span></strong></a>”.</p>
<p>A survey by of all people The Tax Institute at H&amp;R Block indicates that “<em>most can&#8217;t answer even the most basic tax questions correctly . . . the majority doesn&#8217;t know a credit from a deduction</em>”. Duh! Hey – it seems that many Americans have something in common with H+R Block tax preparers!</p>
<p>*WebCPA reports that “<a href="http://www.webcpa.com/article.cfm?articleid=30419"><strong><span>IRS May Expand Enforcement During Tax Processing</span></strong></a>” and pay closer attention to returns claiming the Child and Dependent Care Credit and Earned Income Credit while in the course of the initial processing of returns.</p>
<p>* The weekly NATP member email newsletter reports-</p>
<p>“<em>The IRS has announced that victims of the severe storms and flooding on December 10, 2008, in the city and county of Honolulu, have more time to make tax payments and file returns. As a result, the IRS is postponing certain deadlines for taxpayers who reside or have a business in the disaster area until February 9, 2009. The postponement applies to return filing, tax payment, and certain other time-sensitive acts otherwise due between December 10, 2008, and February 9, 2009</em>.”</p>
<p>* We have a winner – actually two. Peter Pappas of THE TAX LAWYER’S BLOG reports the results of his online poll in “<a href="http://blog.pappastax.com/index.php/2009/01/16/worst-tax-cheat-poll-results-final-kiss-your-sister-we-have-a-tie"><strong><span>Worst Tax Cheat Poll Results Final: Kiss Your Sister, We Have a Tie</span></strong></a>”.</p>
<p>* It appears that BO’s proposed economic “stimulus” package will include some individual tax breaks &#8211; Among them, according to the press release by Charles Rangel for the House Ways &amp; Means Committee, the following:</p>
<p>· refundable tax credit of $500 per worker/$1000 per couple (up to $200,000 income)<br />· expansion of EITC<br />· expansion of child tax credit<br />· simplification of education credits and making the credit partially refundable<br />· turning the $7,500 loan for first time home buyers during 2008 into a subsidy (no repayment requirement)<br />· increased expensing for businesses<br />· increased bonus depreciation for businesses<br />· increased (5-year) carryback of net operating losses for businesses<br />· &#8220;prospective&#8221; repeal of Treasury&#8217;s illegal section 382 ruling (Notice 2008-83).<br />· annual one-year AMT fix {I added this to list – rdf}</p>
<p>More and expanded refundable credits – great! The mouths of tax-fraud scammers are most certainly watering.</p>
<p>I will provide more information when available.</p>
<p>TTFN</span></div>
<p><a href=http://wanderingtaxpro.blogspot.com/2009/01/whats-buzz-tell-me-whats-happennin_17.html>This post is from THE WANDERING TAX PRO</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thetaxforum.org/1466/what%e2%80%99s-the-buzz-tell-me-what%e2%80%99s-a-happennin%e2%80%99.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HAIL TO THE TAX CODE!</title>
		<link>http://thetaxforum.org/1470/hail-to-the-tax-code.htm</link>
		<comments>http://thetaxforum.org/1470/hail-to-the-tax-code.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tax Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inauguration Day;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kay Bell;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetaxforum.org/?p=1470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just got the word from Kay Bell of DON’T MESS WITH TAXES that “Tax Carnival #46: Inauguration Day” is here! Hail to the Tax Code! Or do you prefer “To Hell with the Tax Code”? My post on “What Not To Do” when looking for a tax preparer is included. Link to the original [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="justify"><span>I just got the word from Kay Bell of DON’T MESS WITH TAXES that “<a href="http://dontmesswithtaxes.typepad.com/dont_mess_with_taxes/2009/01/tax-carnival-46-inauguration-edition.html"><strong><span>Tax Carnival #46: Inauguration Day</span></strong></a>” is here!  Hail to the Tax Code!  Or do you prefer “To Hell with the Tax Code”?</p>
<p>My post on “What Not To Do” when looking for a tax preparer is included.</span></div>
<p><a href=http://wanderingtaxpro.blogspot.com/2009/01/hail-to-tax-code.html>Link to the original site</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thetaxforum.org/1470/hail-to-the-tax-code.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>KAY BELL&#8217;S TAX TIPS</title>
		<link>http://thetaxforum.org/1477/kay-bells-tax-tips.htm</link>
		<comments>http://thetaxforum.org/1477/kay-bells-tax-tips.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tax Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruce MacFarland;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jersey City;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kay Bell;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetaxforum.org/?p=1477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In addition to writing the blog DON’T MESS WITH TAXES, Kay Bell, the yellow rose of taxes, also writes on federal income taxes for BankRate.com. She is currently penning a series of daily tax tips. Today’s tip is “Second Chance for Economic Stimulus Check” and discusses last year’s election year bribe rebate check and the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="justify"><span>In addition to writing the blog DON’T MESS WITH TAXES, Kay Bell, the yellow rose of taxes, also writes on federal income taxes for BankRate.com.  She is currently penning a series of daily tax tips.</p>
<p>Today’s tip is “<a href="http://www.bankrate.com/brm/itax/tips/20090123-recovery-rebate-credit-a1.asp"><strong><span>Second Chance for Economic Stimulus Check</span></strong></a>” and discusses last year’s election year bribe rebate check and the refundable Recovery Rebate Credit on the 2008 Form 1040 and 1040A.</p>
<p>The tip includes and observations and insights of two of Kay’s fellow tax bloggers – Bruce MacFarland, the taxguy, and “<em>a tax accountant in Jersey City, N.J</em>” who writes a blog titled THE WANDERING TAX PRO.</p>
<p>Good job, Kay!</span></div>
<p><a href=http://wanderingtaxpro.blogspot.com/2009/01/kay-bells-tax-tips.html>Link to the original site</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thetaxforum.org/1477/kay-bells-tax-tips.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WHAT’S THE BUZZ?  TELL ME WHAT’S A HAPPENNIN’ –</title>
		<link>http://thetaxforum.org/1478/what%e2%80%99s-the-buzz-tell-me-what%e2%80%99s-a-happennin%e2%80%99-%e2%80%93.htm</link>
		<comments>http://thetaxforum.org/1478/what%e2%80%99s-the-buzz-tell-me-what%e2%80%99s-a-happennin%e2%80%99-%e2%80%93.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tax Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Association of Chartered Certified Accountants;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chas Roy-Chowdhury;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cindy Morus;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Shaviro;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit Free Press;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ebay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gina Gwozdz;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal Revenue Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Maule;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kay Bell;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kelly Phillips Erb;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kristine McKinley;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Year's Day;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online radio program;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Pappas;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychological software;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software program;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software treatment;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Court;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAXING TIMES;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trish McIntyre;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Michigan;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetaxforum.org/?p=1478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[* Let’s start the BUZZ off with an excellent article by Thursday Bram at Investopedia titled “Refund Anticipation Loans: Ripoff Or Royal Screwjob?”. If you ask me – both! * Kay Bell reports in her post “California Tax Refunds on Hold” at DON’T MESS WITH TAXES that “the state&#8217;s controller says that if lawmakers don&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="justify"><span>* Let’s start the BUZZ off with an excellent article by Thursday Bram at Investopedia titled “<a href="http://www.investopedia.com/articles/taxes/09/refund-anticipation-loans.asp"><strong><span>Refund Anticipation Loans: Ripoff Or Royal Screwjob?</span></strong></a>”. If you ask me – both!</p>
<p>* Kay Bell reports in her post “</span><a href="http://dontmesswithtaxes.typepad.com/dont_mess_with_taxes/2009/01/california-tax-refunds-on-hold.html" target="_blank"><span><strong>California Tax Refunds on Hold</strong></span></a><span>” at DON’T MESS WITH TAXES that “<em>the state&#8217;s controller says that if lawmakers don&#8217;t come up with a way to cover California&#8217;s $42 billion budget deficit, on Feb. 1 he will put a 30-day hold on tax refunds and some other payments</em>”.</p>
<p>* Another reason not to rely on tax software, such as Turbo Tax, if you don’t know what you are doing. Kay Bell reports in her post “<a href="http://dontmesswithtaxes.typepad.com/dont_mess_with_taxes/2009/01/geithner-and-turbotax-grilled-again.html"><strong><span>Geithner &#8212; and TurboTax &#8212; Grilled Again</span></strong></a>” that “<em>Geithner acknowledged that he had used TurboTax</em>”.</p>
<p>The “Turbo Tax Defense” doesn’t work in Tax Court – but apparently it works in Congress.</p>
<p>* Kay Bell also writes on taxes for Bankrate.com. She has begun a daily series of tax tips. Friday’s tip – “<a href="http://www.bankrate.com/brm/itax/tips/20090123-recovery-rebate-credit-a1.asp"><strong><span>Second Chance for Economic Stimulus Check</span></strong></a>” &#8211; included the observations and insights of two of her fellow tax bloggers – Bruce the taxguy and yours truly.</p>
<p>* Fellow twit Cindy Morus gives us “<a href="http://www.mendyourmoney.com/top-10-ways-to-jumpstart-your-new-years-finances"><strong><span>Top 10+ Ways to Jumpstart your New Year’s Finances!</span></strong></a>” over at MEND YOUR MONEY. The list includes &#8211; “<em>Set up an appointment with your tax professional early</em>”. Only not too early – make sure you have all your “stuff” before you see your tax pro!</p>
<p>While it is not on the list, an earlier post from Cindy suggests that you “<a href="http://www.mendyourmoney.com/update-your-beneficiaries"><strong><span>Update Your Beneficiaries</span></strong></a>”.</p>
<p>* If you missed the online-radio interview with Kristine McKinley of EBIZ TAX TIPS conducted by the “eBay Selling Coach” you can click <a href="http://internetbiztaxtips.com/2009/01/recording-ready"><strong><span>here</span></strong></a> to listen.</p>
<p>Also appearing on an online radio program this week was TAXGIRL Kelly Phillips Erb discussing Small Biz Taxes. Click <a href="http://www.taxgirl.com/ask-the-taxgirl-live-its-today"><strong><span>here</span></strong></a> to listen.</p>
<p>* Peter Pappas of THE TAX LAWYER’S BLOG suggests that we “<a href="http://blog.pappastax.com/index.php/2009/01/18/repeal-the-corporate-income-tax-and-bring-those-jobs-back-home"><strong><span>Repeal the Corporate Income Tax and Bring Those Jobs Back Home</span></strong></a>”. Be sure to read my comment.</p>
<p>* June Walker provides an excellent and creative answer to a question from a psychiatrist who was confused by the Turbo Tax software treatment of psychological software he purchased in her also excellently titled post, “</span><a href="http://junewalkeronline.blogspot.com/2009/01/software-cannot-replace-experience.html"><span><strong>Software Cannot Replace Experience</strong></span></a><span>”. The highlights below are mine.</p>
<p>“<em>Dear Dr. Mark,</em></span></div>
<div align="justify"><span><em><span>.<br /></span>You see, I&#8217;ve been feeling really depressed. Suicidal actually. I bought this software program Mind-Mend. Says it has taken 20+years of psychiatric experience and rolled it up into this software program. There are 10 steps to avoiding stress. One step says do 15 minutes of meditation each day. Another step has me stand on my head for 10 minutes so that my circulation increases. My gym instructor says I should not stand on my head because of an old army injury. I am confused, what should I do? </em></span></div>
<div align="justify"><span><em><span>.<br /></span>As a doctor you might tell me that stress and suicidal tendencies call for different levels of treatment as well as different levels of urgency and that I should speak with a professional. You might also say that there is no way that 20 years personal experience could be put into a software program and have the same success rate as weekly visits with a therapist when treating something as complex as suicide. </em></span></div>
<div align="justify"><span><em><span>.<br /></span>This is my round-about of saying what I have said on this blog many times before: <strong>A software program written for the simple world of employees cannot replace a tax pro experienced with indie tax situations</strong></em>.”</p>
<p>* Professor James Maule has some interesting comments on depreciation in his post “<a href="http://www.mauledagain.blogspot.com/#5601900134334147586"><strong><span>Just Because It Didn&#8217;t Work the First 50 Times Doesn&#8217;t Mean It Will Work Next Time</span></strong></a>” at MAULED AGAIN.</p>
<p>”<em>The depreciation provisions . . . have contributed to the current economic mess by allowing taxpayers to compute taxable income as though their economic position declined when in fact it remained the same or improved</em>”.</p>
<p>Jim agrees with what I discussed at TWTP in my post “<a href="http://wanderingtaxpro.blogspot.com/2007/11/here-is-something-to-think-about.html"><strong><span>Here is Something to Think About</span></strong></a>”. He discusses the idea in more detail in “<strong><a href="http://www.mauledagain.blogspot.com/#6591828397896444216"><span>Instead of More Favorable Depreciation Deductions, Eliminate Them?</span></a></strong></span><span>”</span><span>.</p>
<p>Goose the Tax Dog (I am assuming Goose is the name of the Dog) also adds his 2 cents on the topic in his post “<a href="http://thetaxstudent.blogspot.com/2009/01/real-estate-depreciation.html"><strong><span>Real Estate Depreciation</span></strong></a>” at THE TAX STUDENT.</p>
<p>I would be interested to hear your comments on what I propose in this post.</p>
<p>* TAXGIRL Kelly Phillips Erb points out that it seems that somewhere someone from the press is giving out bad information on BO’s stimulus package in her post “<a href="http://www.taxgirl.com/ask-the-taxgirl-dont-look-for-a-second-rebate-check-in-the-mail"><strong><span>Ask the taxgirl: Don’t Look for a Second Rebate Check in the Mail!</span></strong></a>”.</p>
<p>Read my, and Kelly’s, lips – THERE WILL NOT BE ANOTHER “STIMULUS” REBATE CHECK! While he didn’t take my advice regarding refundable credits, at least BO listened to me about rebates.</p>
<p>* Right on Prof Daniel Shaviro of <a href="http://danshaviro.blogspot.com/2009/01/happiest-word-in-english-language.html"><strong><span>START MAKING SENSE</span></strong></a> – “<em><strong>Happiest word in the English language {is} ‘Ex&#8221;, when placed with a dash in front of the words ‘President George W. Bush’</strong></em>.”</p>
<p>* A great Q+A post from Gina Gwozdz at TAX TIPS BLOG on “</span><a href="http://glgcpa.com/blog/2009/01/21/1099-vs-w2/"><span><strong>1099 vs W2?</strong></span></a><span>” She makes the excellent point – “<em>Your employer does not get to decide if they can pay you as a W-2 employee or a 1099 contractor. The law determines your classification</em>.”</p>
<p>* Trish McIntyre of OUR TAXING TIMES provides the word on the economic “stimulus” rebate you did or didn’t receive last year in her post “<a href="http://trishmc.typepad.com/mac_tax_talk/2009/01/stimulus-rebatetaxable-this-year.html"><strong><span>Stimulus Rebate-Taxable This Year?</span></strong></a>”. The answer, of course, is NO – for both federal and state returns.</p>
<p>Trish points out that you could get an additional rebate added to the refund, or subtracted from the balance due, on your 2008 Form 1040 or 1040A – “<em>For example, the full stimulus rebate a married couple with one child could receive was $1500. A child born in 2008 qualifies the couple for an extra $300</em>.”</p>
<p>The 2008 “stimulus” rebate election year bribe caused tons and tons of confusion last year, completely overwhelming the IRS – and I expect the confusion to continue to apply to 2008 tax returns. As was the case with the last rebate check, there will be millions of errors on 2008 federal returns.</p>
<p>* I came across an interesting bit of information in my “wanderings” on Thursday &#8211; “<em>The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, the global body for professional accountants, <strong>views the U.S. tax regime as one of the world&#8217;s most complex</strong>, according to Chas Roy-Chowdhury, London-based head of taxation</em>.”</p>
<p>* In item from Freep.com (Detroit Free Press) titled “<a href="http://www.freep.com/article/20090123/BUSINESS07/901230448/1020/BUSINESS/Tax+rebate+impact+on+economy+is+weak"><strong><span>Tax Rebate Impact on Economy is Weak</span></strong></a>” we learn “<em>Two University of Michigan economics professors have some advice for President Barack Obama about how not to design his economic stimulus package. Their advice: Don&#8217;t make tax rebates a big part of it</em>.”</p>
<p>The professors confirm what I have been saying all along – “<em>Onetime payments from the government are a weak economic stimulus</em>”.</p>
<p>Some statistics from the article &#8211; ”<em>The U-M economists found that only 20% of U.S. households mostly spent their tax rebates, while about 48% used their rebate mostly to pay debt and roughly 32% mostly saved their rebate checks</em>.”</p>
<p>* Always leave ‘em laughing – you will find some good parenting advice from BUSINESS PUNDIT in the post “</span><a title="Permanent Link to Always Check Your Child’s Homework Before it Gets Turned In" href="http://www.businesspundit.com/always-check-your-childs-homework-before-it-gets-turned-in/"><span><strong>Always Check Your Child’s Homework Before it Gets Turned In</strong></span></a><span>”.</p>
<p>TTFN</span></div>
<p><a href=http://wanderingtaxpro.blogspot.com/2009/01/whats-buzz-tell-me-whats-happennin_24.html>Link to the original site</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thetaxforum.org/1478/what%e2%80%99s-the-buzz-tell-me-what%e2%80%99s-a-happennin%e2%80%99-%e2%80%93.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>KAY BELL DOES IT AGAIN!</title>
		<link>http://thetaxforum.org/1479/kay-bell-does-it-again.htm</link>
		<comments>http://thetaxforum.org/1479/kay-bell-does-it-again.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tax Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KAY BELL DOES;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kay Bell;]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetaxforum.org/?p=1479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kay Bell brings the Wandering Tax Pro and the taxguy together again in her post “Are You a Good or Bad Tax Client?” at DON’T MESS WITH TAXES. Kay starts off the post by telling us – “There are lots of stories each tax season about how taxpayers can find a reputable, qualified tax preparer. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="justify"><span>Kay Bell brings the Wandering Tax Pro and the taxguy together again in her post “<a href="http://dontmesswithtaxes.typepad.com/dont_mess_with_taxes/2009/01/are-you-a-good-or-bad-tax-client.html"><strong><span>Are You a Good or Bad Tax Client?</span></strong></a>” at DON’T MESS WITH TAXES.</p>
<p>Kay starts off the post by telling us – “<em>There are lots of stories each tax season about how taxpayers can find a reputable, qualified tax preparer. . . But there&#8217;s a flip side to this coin. How do tax professionals find good clients?</em>”<br /><span>.</span></span></div>
<div align="justify"><span>The post goes on to list a handful of the gripes we tax professionals (taxguy and I, some fellow twits we all share) have about how some of our clients behave. Believe me, Kay only scratches the surface.</span></div>
<div align="justify"><span><span>. </span><br />She does make some good points. For example, “<em>if you and I were better clients, we&#8217;d not only make our tax advisors&#8217; jobs easier, we&#8217;d likely end up with a better tax result</em>”.</p>
<p>Her bottom line is also something all clients should take to heart – “<em>A little bit of planning and preparation on your part will enable your tax pro to do a better, and bigger tax-saving, job for you</em>”.</p>
<p>Check out the post when you get a chance!</span></div>
<p><a href=http://wanderingtaxpro.blogspot.com/2009/01/kay-bell-does-it-again.html>Link to the original site</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thetaxforum.org/1479/kay-bell-does-it-again.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

